Electron beams from the NRCC research accelerator <A NAME=spc_sc_32> </A>



next up previous contents
Next: Electron beams from Up: Results and Discussion Previous: Overview and statistics

Electron beams from the NRCC research accelerator  

The NRCC accelerator is a Vickers research accelerator with no head assembly. The geometry of the experimental set up (fig.1) includes a titanium exit vacuum window (0.127 mm thick), a tungsten scattering foil (0.092 mm thick), a square collimator (steel, 20.3 cm thick) and a monitoring ion chamber (very thin mylar). The water phantom container is made of PMMA (9 mm thick). The beams irradiate the water phantom horizontally. The field size is 88 cm on the phantom surface and SSD = 96 cm. The energy of the electron beam exiting the vacuum window is known independently with an accuracy of 1%[9]. The two beams (10.0 and 20.0 MeV) have an identical experimental set up except for the incident electron energy at the exit vacuum window. The dose measurements have been done with a small diode detector, a parallel plate ion chamber and a cylindrical farmer chamber. After correction of the ion chamber results for stopping power ratios, all three measurement techniques gave the same results within 0.5%. The measured data are from Carl Ross of National Research Council of Canada.

The results for these two beams are shown in figure 9 and 10 respectively. Because of the geometry of the experimental set up, the electron's energy spread is very small and there are few contaminant photons in the beams. The two beams have narrow angular spread although the electrons from the jaws lead to a small tail right out to 80. Note that in order to match the experimental values of R in the central-axis depth-dose curves the incident electron energies at the exit vacuum window used in the simulation were increased by 1.5% compared to those determined independently (viz. 10 and 20 MeV). This slight discrepancy may be caused by the measured energy or by the stopping power used in the calculation (to be resolved in future investigations). The remarkable agreement between calculated and measured dose distributions shown in fig.10 marked a milestone in benchmarking the simulation code BEAM[10].



next up previous contents
Next: Electron beams from Up: Results and Discussion Previous: Overview and statistics



Dave Rogers' generic account
Fri Jun 16 11:40:47 EDT 1995